Showing posts with label buzzword. Show all posts
Showing posts with label buzzword. Show all posts

Office jargon: go-live

A colleague recently received a work-related email that included the following sentence:

I’d love to get this up and running before the go-live


It seems that phrases such as 'go-live date' are being shortened to give a new noun, 'go-live'. Well, new to me at any rate.

I've even found a Computer Weekly article that uses 'go-live' (as a noun) in the headline:

Screengrab from http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/barts-npfit-golive-ends-up-in.html

Australian business-speak

It looks like business-speak isn't limited to the US and the UK: Roz has written in with some examples heard during a one-hour 'Dialogue Day' session at the Australian Taxation Office. Here they are, with Roz's comments in brackets.

  • Key drivers
  • Key deliverables
  • Key strategies (why can't they use some synonyms for 'key'?)
  • ...sessions around delivery plans (whatever happened to 'about' or 'regarding' or 'concerning'?)
  • At the end of the day
  • Cascade down corporate messages (well, cascades don't often go up do they?)
  • Efficiencies made to business (how do you 'make' an efficiency?)
  • Big ticket item
  • Co-design session
  • Impacting on all the messages out there
  • Hip pocket
  • Value-adding
  • A deliberate service model (what – as opposed to an accidental one?)
  • Sophisticated profiling and risk
  • Level playing field
  • The tax agent community (yeah, there's probably an axe-murdering community too. Everything has a community these days)
  • Principles-based
  • Penalty 'safe-harbour'
  • Grass-roots issues
  • Base tenants (I think the $120,000-per-year idiot meant tenets)
  • Capability-building projects

Thanks for those, Roz. 'Level playing field' is one that often appears in our publication; we hear all sorts of gubbins about 'communities'; and 'impacting' is one of my personal bugbears. So I feel your pain...