Showing posts with label business-speak. Show all posts
Showing posts with label business-speak. Show all posts

Goodcopybadycopy: 'Scenes from corporate life'

Being interested in language and working for a large company, I find it easy to relate to the 'Scenes from corporate life' cartoons that appear weekly on the goodcopybadcopy blog.

This one is my current favourite:





Goodcopybadcopy: Cartoons

Onward communicate

From a corporate email I received recently:

Please feel free to onward communicate to your teams.


I'm not sure what I like less - the verb 'onward communicate' or the lack of subject (onward communicate what?).

Googling "onward communicate"
only gives 61 results so perhaps it won't catch on.

Australian business-speak

It looks like business-speak isn't limited to the US and the UK: Roz has written in with some examples heard during a one-hour 'Dialogue Day' session at the Australian Taxation Office. Here they are, with Roz's comments in brackets.

  • Key drivers
  • Key deliverables
  • Key strategies (why can't they use some synonyms for 'key'?)
  • ...sessions around delivery plans (whatever happened to 'about' or 'regarding' or 'concerning'?)
  • At the end of the day
  • Cascade down corporate messages (well, cascades don't often go up do they?)
  • Efficiencies made to business (how do you 'make' an efficiency?)
  • Big ticket item
  • Co-design session
  • Impacting on all the messages out there
  • Hip pocket
  • Value-adding
  • A deliberate service model (what – as opposed to an accidental one?)
  • Sophisticated profiling and risk
  • Level playing field
  • The tax agent community (yeah, there's probably an axe-murdering community too. Everything has a community these days)
  • Principles-based
  • Penalty 'safe-harbour'
  • Grass-roots issues
  • Base tenants (I think the $120,000-per-year idiot meant tenets)
  • Capability-building projects

Thanks for those, Roz. 'Level playing field' is one that often appears in our publication; we hear all sorts of gubbins about 'communities'; and 'impacting' is one of my personal bugbears. So I feel your pain...