However, I have noticed several commentators talk or write about the "globesity epidemic": here in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, for example. The World Wide Words page also quotes the Guardian doing the same.
This leads me to ask: if globesity is, by its nature, global, shouldn't it always be a pandemic ("prevalent over a large part of the world" OED), not just an epidemic ("widespread in a community", OED)? And if yes, wouldn't a "globesity pandemic" be a tautology anyway?
And now I'm off home for my dinner.
2 comments:
Nobody knows what a pandemic is.
In fact, "global" means you don't need either pandemic or epidemic.
Oh, I quite agree.
Post a Comment