On Monday the London Lite ran a short piece on the entries for this year's Turner Prize. Here's part of it:
I feel sorry for the caption-writer on this one. David Enrico sounds a more plausible name than Enrico David (in my opinion).
At least the London Lite is less critical of the Turner Prize than the Daily Mail...
The Strunk cost fallacy
2 days ago
2 comments:
Share your sympathy for the caption writer - and 'London Lite' is clearly well-named.
As for the 'DM', the editorial policy seems to be one of actively inciting spite on all fronts - often directing it at the paper's own columnists (e.g. Liz Jones). Nasty stuff, very. Tried reading the comments on a few occasions: gave up, as the experience proved dispiriting beyond belief.
Last I saw, the Daily Mail's "Not The Turner Prize" consisted mostly of incredibly bad watercolours and portraits of people's grandmothers. Truly awful stuff.
Post a Comment