Pseudo-indecent photographs

Posted by JD (The Engine Room) on Saturday, 9 May 2009
Labels: , , ,
Today's picture is again a BBC News screengrab, this time from an article. I've highlighted the phrase of interest.


I'm sure that's supposed to read 'indecent pseudo-photographs'...

2 comments:

Fran Hill said...

Ah, the way syntax can trip you up. Or should that be sin-tax in this case?

9 May 2009 at 19:31
James said...

Couldn't this be a photograph that appears to be indecent, but actually isn't?

18 May 2009 at 17:57

Post a Comment